Suggested removal of the script's rating function (2024)

JoyceTom

§

Posted:

Report comment

Suggested removal of the script's rating function:
Bad - script does not work
OK - script works, but has bugs
Good - script works

reserve:
No rating - just a question, comment, or feature reques

Many authors register accounts in batches for their own scripts to get good reviews and make their scripts rank at the front.

Reporting an author will result in your account being banned.

Negative reviews will also lead to account ban.

JoyceTom

§

Posted:

Report comment

9358484646Banned

§

Posted:

Report comment

JoyceTom

§

Posted:

Report comment

By removing the rating system, Greasy Fork can benefit in several ways:

1.Reduced manipulation: The current system can be gamed by authors who create multiple accounts to rate their own scripts, artificially inflating their ratings. By removing ratings, this type of manipulation is eliminated.
2.Improved user experience: Without the threat of account bans for negative reviews or reporting authors, users can provide honest feedback without fear of retaliation. This leads to a more open and helpful community.
3.Less drama and conflict: The rating system can create drama and conflict between authors and users. By removing ratings, the focus shifts from ratings to the actual quality and functionality of the scripts.
4.Simplified moderation: With no ratings to moderate, the Greasy Fork team can focus on more important tasks, such as ensuring script quality and maintaining site stability.

Overall, removing the rating system can lead to a more positive and productive community, where users can focus on sharing and improving scripts without the distractions and pitfalls of a rating system.

9358484646Banned

§

Posted:

Report comment

9358484646Banned

§

Posted:

Report comment

Many scripts rank themselves at the top by posting positive reviews, but they are not usable after installation. When users leave negative reviews, they are inexplicably deleted. I checked the management log and found that a large number of users who reported negative reviews were directly banned, while those who posted positive reviews were not punished. Can you only give positive reviews and not negative reviews? Your practice will cause users to be afraid to give real feedback, which will eventually damage the reputation and user experience of the entire community. I hope you can pay attention to this issue, treat every user's evaluation and report fairly, and ensure the fairness and reliability of the platform.

Here are some suggestions:

1. Improve the reporting and review mechanism
Transparency: Ensure that the reporting and review process is transparent, and users can view the progress and results of the report.
Independent review: Introduce an independent review team to handle reports and feedback to avoid favoritism among internal personnel.
2. Negative review protection mechanism
Protect negative reviews: Before negative reviews are deleted, they must go through a strict review process to ensure that the negative reviews are real user feedback.
Time-limited protection: Newly released negative reviews are not allowed to be deleted within a certain period of time so that more users can see real feedback.
3. Crack down on fake reviews
Data analysis: Use big data analysis tools to detect abnormal behaviors of fake reviews, such as a large number of good reviews in a short period of time, similar review content, etc.
Severe punishment measures: For accounts that are proven to have fake reviews, severe punishment measures will be taken, including but not limited to banning accounts and removing scripts.

JoyceTom

§

Posted:

Report comment

9358484646Banned

§

Posted:

Report comment